11/19/14

Faith in Faith?

Interesting topic, this. I do think, when we look at this topic of faith and sola fide, that Lutheranism differs from the rest of Protestantism, including Reformed Theology, Arminianism, and good old mainstream Evangelicalism (i.e. Baptists and Methodists of all stripes. Yes, I know that is a huge group with all sorts of different stances).

How exactly is Lutheranism different in this arena? To see that, we must look at how different camps view faith. Rest assured, we are very different. I hesitate to even use the word "Protestant" when I speak of Lutheranism. We're not really Protestant; we're Evangelical Catholics.

The Difference

In Protestantism of all stripes, the main premise is simply this: Everyone that believes in Christ is saved. (Jn 3:16, Ac 16:31, Ro 10:9-13)

In Lutheranism it is this: I baptize you in the Triune Name of God. (Mt 28:18-20)

Does this mean Lutheranism discounts belief in Christ? Far from it! Rather, Lutheranism sees faith as something that is in the Word of God and simply receives and recognizes what is true. Therefore, we are baptized and thus saved, and we had better not call God a liar. He has spoken it. It is so.

Does this mean that Protestantism discounts baptism? Well, no. But the grounds of assurance of salvation is ultimately rooted in faith, which is subjective, and not in baptism, which is objective.

Thus, we could look at this topic in a sort of logical format. In Protestantism, the major premise is that everyone who believes is saved. The Protestant is thus pushed to looking to himself. In other words, the Protestant will say something like: I believe. Therefore I am saved.

The Lutheran on the other hand will look outside of himself and may say something like: I am baptized. God put His Triune Name on me in Holy Baptism. God always tells the truth. Baptism now saves you. I receive this truth from God because the Word says so.

The biggest difference here is that for Protestants faith is a very introspective sort of thing. Don't get me wrong, there is a time and a place for introspection, for sure. That being said, in Protestantism, whereas faith may indeed look to the Word of God (e.g. Jo 3:16, Ro 10), it ultimately ends up asking itself if it is really faith. In other words, the Protestant always comes back to around to the question: How do I know I have really truly believed - and therefore am saved?

Lutherans, on the other hand, look to the promise of God given in Baptism. We know we believe not because we believe, but because Christ gave us Himself on the tree of Calvary and then in our Baptism. God does not lie. I was baptized, but more importantly, I AM baptized.

Summation

Ultimately the biggest difference we see here is in Sacramental efficacy. Some Protestants affirm that the Sacraments are effective (the Reformed), but stop short of saying that the Sacraments are always effective. We could use the example of the Eucharist here. In much of Protestantism, the Eucharist is nothing more than a bare memorial of pious remembrance. In Reformed Theology, the believer communes with Christ in faith, but the unbeliever receives only bread and wine. In Lutheranism, the Eucharist is the true body and blood of Christ given and shed for you, regardless of whether or not the person receiving it is a believer. Every partaker of the Eucharist receives Christ; in their mouth.

Lutheran Theology is very Sacramental, and hence, very objective when it comes to faith and salvation. We are saved (and know we are saved) because we are baptized into Christ, receive His true body and blood in our mouth for the forgiveness of sins, and are forgiven in Holy Absolution. In these ways, Christ is given to us.

Protestant Theology is not Sacramental, and hence, very subjective when it comes to faith and salvation. They are saved (and know they are saved) because they believe in Christ.

Hopefully this is helpful. It's a very rough sketch of the topic and volumes could be written about it. But this, as I see it, it a pretty accurate summary.

+Grace and Peace+

8 comments:

  1. What is the place of universal objective justification in this scheme? I thought the entire world was declared righteous before God regardless of faith, because of the death of Jesus. Salvation need not be distributed as some Lutherans say, because it was already distributed at the cross. Wouldn't baptism be more of a confirmation of that justification?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm unsure what you're getting at here, but I have never heard a Lutheran say that salvation does not need to be "distributed" or "received" via the means of grace. I don't think one's stance on UOJ is relevant to this really. The simple thing I am pointing out is that Lutheranism has a different flavor of sola fide than the rest of mainstream Protestantism. We receive the gifts of God via Word and Sacrament, and we look to Christ and those gives given to us for assurance. e.g. Our faith is in the Word and promise of God.

    ReplyDelete
  3. We (Lutherans) trust in the external Word. Most Christians put their trust in something that they have done (a decision, their seriousness, etc.)…even in their faith.

    We can have assurance totally outside of anything that we have done, or experienced…but place our trust in what He has done…for us, to us. So we have faith in God…and not faith in faith.

    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. We can also live like antinomians and have false assurance, treating the sacraments as magic and somehow locking God into a quid pro quo. One needn't resort ot pietism to state that there is and should be some subjective elment to our faith.

    ReplyDelete
  5. We trust in God's promises…ALONE.

    Looking inside for proof leads either to pride or despair (or to phoniness).

    ReplyDelete
  6. Try this one for a bit, "Does Baptism save?":

    http://theoldadam.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/does-baptism-save.mp3

    Couldn't hurt!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kirk - I agree with you. No disagreement.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I've been reading some Reformed writings lately. I have noticed that there is much advice and counsel for dealing with one's "frames" and condition. Would you say that Lutheranism is markedly different from that?

    ReplyDelete