This is the first in a 5 part series I will be writing as a Lutheran response to the 5 points of Calvinism as well as the 5 points of the Remonstrants put forth at Dordt to challenge Reformed doctrine by those influenced by Reformed pastor Jacob Arminius. Other Pelagian views that deny original sin and reject the depravity of man are unbiblical and outside of the Christian faith, so I will not deal with them here.
If you are looking for a quick, short, and spot-on Lutheran evaluation of the 5 points of Calvinism, my friend Pr. Jordan Cooper has done an excellent short work on this topic over at his blog. The work can be found here:
Lutheran Evaluation of the 5 Points of Calvinism - Pr. Cooper
From the outset, it is important to note that many Calvinists and Arminians see everything in non-Roman Catholic theology (sometimes Calvinists classify Roman Catholicism as 'Arminian' too) as falling into one of these two categories. So, in essence, when we say we are Lutherans, a Calvinist might first ask: "Are Lutherans Calvinists or Arminians?" The answer is neither, of course, as we shall see as the 5 points are looked at.
The first major point that the Remonstrants challenged was the Reformed doctrine of the depravity of man. I will start with the Arminian doctrine, although the Arminian doctrine is fuzzy depending on who you ask. For that reason, I will try to represent what is called "Classical" Arminianism. That is to say, the original teaching of Arminius and his direct followers.
Arminius, contrary to many of the Semi-Pelagian and Pelagian beliefs of today, did uphold total depravity for the most part. He states:
“In this state, the free will of man is not only wounded, maimed, infirmed, bent and weakened; but it is also imprisoned, destroyed and lost. And its powers are not only debilitated and useless unless they are assisted by grace but it has no powers whatever except such as are excited by divine grace… Exactly correspondent to this darkness of the mind and perverseness of the heart, is the utter weakness of all the powers to perform that which is truly good, and to omit the perpetration of that which is evil, in a due mode and from a due end and cause.” ~~~ (John D. Wagner, Arminius Speaks: Essential Writings on Predestination, Free Will and the Nature of God (2011), p.3).
John Wesley, the famous founder of Methodism and perhaps the most well-known Arminian pastor, states:
“But was there good intermingled with the evil? Was there not light intermixed with darkness? No; not at all: “God saw that the heart of man was only evil.”… For God, who “saw the whole imagination of his heart to be only evil,” saw likewise, that it was only the same, that is, it “was only evil continually;” every year, every day, every hour, every moment. He never deviated into good… From all these we learn concerning man in his natural state, unassisted by the grace of God, that “every imagination of the thoughts of his heart is” still “evil, only evil” and that “continually.”” (Wesley, J., The Works of John Wesley, Third Edition: Complete and Unabridged, (2007), 14vols., 6:57.)
Savvy Calvinists such as R.C. Sproul have noted this. He said:
"He insists that is was “imprisoned, destroyed, and lost.” The language of Augustine, Martin Luther, or John Calvin is scarcely stronger than that of Arminius" (Sproul, R. C., Willing to Believe: The Controversy over Free Will (1997), p.126"
So then, Classic Arminian theology affirms the absolute necessity of the grace of God before regeneration. The difference in Arminius' doctrine of total depravity actually lies more in his doctrine of resistible grace than it does in depravity. Nevertheless, Arminius' doctrine here of the depravity of man is that man needs grace in order to be able to make a choice for or against God. Man can only reject God apart from grace.
The doctrine of total depravity in Calvinism is summed up well here:
"Because of the fall, man is unable of himself to savingly believe the gospel.
The sinner is dead, blind, and deaf to the things of God; his heart is deceitful
and desperately corrupt. His will is not free, it is in bondage to his evil
nature; therefore, he will not--indeed he cannot--choose good over evil in the
spiritual realm. Consequently, it takes much more than the Spirit's assistance
to bring a sinner to Christ--it takes regeneration by which the Spirit makes the
sinner alive and gives him a new nature. Faith is not something man contributes
to salvation but is itself a part of God's gift of salvation--it is God's gift
to the sinner, not the sinner’s gift to God. (Genesis 2:15-17, Romans 5:12,
Psalm 51:5, 1 Corinthians 2:14, Romans 3:10-18, Jeremiah 17:9, John 6:44,
Ephesians 2:1-10) Steele and Thomas(1)" http://www.monergism.com/directory/link_category/Reformed-Theology/The-Five-Points-of-Calvinism/
Presbyterian pastor and theologian R.C. Sproul offers up a brief article on total depravity found here: http://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/onsite/sproul/depravity.html
And popular Reformed Baptist preacher John Piper writes this: http://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/piper/depravity.html
Thus, in Reformed thought, man is depraved to the point of needing grace not only to put him in a position to make a decision, but to regenerate him. Man can do nothing apart from this. There is no synergism involved whatsoever. This is very similar to Arminian doctrine in one way: Both theologies stress that man is totally dead in sin and the will can do nothing of itself apart from divine grace that precedes regeneration. But the difference between the two is also quite large. The Arminian view puts man in a position by grace alone to respond of his own will to the offer given. In Calvinism, the grace actually regenerates and gives faith itself.
How do Lutherans respond to all of this? We certainly affirm the depravity of man, of course. Lutherans are also monergists like the Reformed; as opposed to synergists like the Arminians. Thus, the Lutheran doctrine of the depravity of man is nearly identical to the Calvinist doctrine of the depravity of man, and affirms, along with both Calvinism and Classic Arminianism, that the will can do nothing apart from grace and grace must precede. We do however agree with the Reformed that grace itself gives faith in the recipient. For Lutherans, regeneration is faith, regeneration gives faith, and regeneration results in faith. Yet we also affirm that this grace can be rejected, but that another topic for another day when we get to irresistible/resistible grace.
The Book of Concord states:
Epitome, I, 8-10: But, on the other hand, we believe, teach, and confess that original sin is not
a slight, but so deep a corruption of human nature that nothing healthy or
uncorrupt has remained in man's body or soul, in his inner or outward powers,
but, as the Church sings: Through Adam's fall is all corrupt, Nature and essence human. This
damage is unspeakable, and cannot be discerned by reason, but only from God's
Word. And [we affirm] that no one but God alone can
separate from one another the nature and this corruption of the nature, which
will fully come to pass through death, in the [blessed] resurrection, where our
nature which we now bear will rise and live eternally without original sin and
separated and sundered from it, as it is written Job
19:26: I shall be compassed again with this my skin, and in my flesh shall I
see God, whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold.
Epitome, II, 3-6: Likewise we believe, teach, and confess that the unregenerate will of man is not
only turned away from God, but also has become an enemy of God, so that it only
has an inclination and desire for that which is evil and contrary to God, as it
is written Gen. 8:21: The imagination of
man's heart is evil from his youth. Also Rom.
8:7: The carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the Law
of God, neither, indeed, can be. Yea, as little as a dead body can quicken
itself to bodily, earthly life, so little can man, who by sin is spiritually
dead, raise himself to spiritual life, as it is written Eph.
2:5: Even when we were dead in sins, He hath quickened us together with
Christ; 2 Cor. 3:5: Not that we are
sufficient of ourselves to think anything good as of ourselves, but that we are
sufficient is of God.
God the Holy Ghost, however, does not effect conversion without means, but uses
for this purpose the preaching and hearing of God's Word, as it is written Rom. 1:16: The Gospel is the power of God unto
salvation to every one that believeth. Also Rom.
10:17: Faith cometh by hearing of the Word of God. And it is God's will that
His Word should be heard, and that man's ears should not be closed. Ps. 95:8. With this Word the Holy Ghost is present, and
opens hearts, so that they, as Lydia in Acts
16:14, are attentive to it, and are thus converted alone through the grace
and power of the Holy Ghost, whose work alone the conversion of man is. For without His
grace, and if He do not grant the increase, our willing and running, our
planting, sowing, and watering, all are nothing, as Christ says John 15:5: Without Me ye can do nothing. With these brief
words He denies to the free will its powers, and ascribes everything to God's
grace, in order that no one may boast before God. 1 Cor. 1:29; 2 Cor. 12:5; Jer.
9:23.
Solid Declaration, II, 11: Now, just as a man who is physically dead cannot of his own powers prepare or
adapt himself to obtain temporal life again, so the man who is spiritually dead
in sins cannot of his own strength adapt or apply himself to the acquisition of
spiritual and heavenly righteousness and life, unless he is delivered and
quickened by the Son of God from the death of sin.
Solid Declaration, II, 85: Accordingly, the man who is not regenerate resists God altogether, and is
entirely a servant of sin, John
8:34; Rom. 6:16. The regenerate
person, however, delights in the Law of God after the inward man, but
nevertheless sees in his members the law of sin, which wars against the law of
the mind; on this account he serves the Law of God with his mind, but with the
flesh the law of sin, Rom.
7:25. In this way the correct opinion can and should be thoroughly, clearly,
and discreetly explained and taught.
On the doctrine of total depravity (the T in the TULIP), although we Lutherans sometimes use different terminology (such as Bondage of the Will) we will shake hands with the Reformed on this one. Man is dead, completely and utterly, and it is God's grace alone that revives him - not just to be able to choose, but actually revives him and grants the gift of faith (cf. Eph 2:8-9).
Great article. As a former nondenom/charismatic turned Lutheran-Calvinist hybrid, I'm excited to see how this series unfolds. I'm convinced that most disagreements between the two camps are more so of terminology than anything. Blessings!
ReplyDeleteAdam - Thanks for your comment. I was a Calvinist for quite some time, as the title of my blog hints at. There certainly is some overlap between the two camps. There is much in common. However, the differences are bigger than one may think. Not only do we reject some of Calvinism's famous points of the TULIP, but that is only the tip of the iceberg. We are not Covenant Theologians and we see the sacraments differently as well.
ReplyDeleteWell, it's important to define what we mean when we critique theological systems. The followers of the Reformers do not always follow what the Reformers themselves taught. So are we critiquing Calvin, or Calvin's followers? Likewise, Lutherans do not accept "double predestination" though there is much evidence that Luther did. So it can be hard deciphering how absolute the disagreements are. For example, Calvin is much more sacramental than most modern Calvinists. Yet, there are many high-church Calvinists within the Reformed world who view the sacraments very similar - if not identical - to the Lutherans. The barriers between the two aren't always evident, which is a good thing!
ReplyDeleteAdam - I'm with you there for the most part. There are some high church Calvinists. No doubt.
ReplyDeleteLuther is different, because it depends solely on which era of Luther's life you cherry pick from. The earlier Luther did hold to double predestination. But the late Luther did not.
http://cyberbrethren.com/2009/12/16/refuting-calvinist-claims-that-luther-taught-double-predestination/
I agree. Justification comes by faith alone. God by a sovereign act of his will gives us the gift of faith. Paul continually affirms that Abraham believed God and it was counted unto him for righteousness (righteousness was imputed unto him, when he wasn't actually righteous in and of himself). We are given the gift of faith. For by grace are you saved through faith and that not of yourselves it is a GIFT OF GOD - not of works least any man should boast. Ephesians 2: 8 - 9.
ReplyDeleteI like to explain it like this. A man went out on to his balcony on a dark, clear night. He began gazing up into the star filled sky. And there before his very eyes a star streaked across the sky. This man had never seen a shooting star before, in fact he had never, ever even heard that there was such a thing. He was stunned with amazement. Seeing this shooting star did not require an act of his will. He just happen to see it. You could say it was given to him to see. Now this man believes in shooting stars. He went back into his home and related to the others there what he had seen. They all looked at him with incredulity. " You must be out of your mind there are no such things a s shooting stars " they all insisted. Despite his constant insistence that he had seen this shooting star he could never persuade any of them. But he remained convinced, he had seen it with his own eyes. He had seen a shooting star. God gives us faith in himself in the same way. He shows himself to us. And when we see Him with our spiritual eyes we become convinced of his existence.
There are other things to consider, like, faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God. Whosoever calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved and I could name a dozen others. All precursors to us receiving the gift of faith.
The question that remains for me is can one who has received this gift of faith ever lose it? I don't believe God will ever take it back, nor do I believe that the enemy can steal it from us, but I'm not convinced that we can't choose to discard it. Satan can't push us over the edge, nor will God stop us from taking that step if we so choose. The things that would lead up to this, I won't include in my post, it is long enough already.
Let me end with these scriptures: Colossians 1:22-23 Being found in Him not having any righteousness of our own but having the righteousness of God which comes through faith in Jesus Christ.
Philippians 3:9 Christ will present us holy, unblamable and unreprovable in His sight " IF " we continue in the faith grounded and settled and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel.
I've heard it said that " IF " is one of the biggest words in the Bible.
My final admonition: Don't be moved away from the hope of the Gospel !
If you've been born again you've been given access to God and the power to approach unto Him through the blood of Jesus Christ. When your being tempted to walk away from your faith, make your final appeal to God. Ask Him if all of this Jesus business is real, he'll be faithful. He will answer and he'll lead you to your place in the world and in the body of Christ. He's done that for me and he's doing that for me. God is more powerful than our flesh and more powerful than our spiritual enemy. Trust in Him.
If we let our sin lead us to abandon our faith - we've abandoned the only thing that can lead us to abandon our sin.
Many Blessings - Johnny
P.S. Have you seen a shooting Star? If Not Pray and ask God to show himself to you. If you do so with an honest heart and you never hear back from God, you'll be in the clear on judgment day. God is a God of his word, a God of integrity and justice. Whosoever calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved ! Romans 10:13
A suggested prayer: God if your real bring yourself to my attention. You created the universe, or so they say, if you can do that, you should have no problem giving me faith in yourself. I'm waiting.
We don't need personal experience when we have the Scriptures which tell us everything God has revealed about Himself.
ReplyDeleteBeing born again is a personal experience.
ReplyDeleteMany Blessings and Merry Christmas ! Johnny