When you think of our Lutheran theology, you think paradox. It’s in the straightforward reading of Scriptures that results in this paradox we find in this theology of the cross. A passage like John 6:63-64 is no different. Themes like the hidden will/revealed will distinction and paradox of monergism and objective grace being for all/you exist there.
Let us first examine John 6:63. Christ stated that the Spirit gives life while the flesh profits nothing. We see here salvation is fully of God. Not one allowance is given for anything in us to will to believe or to be renewed to new life in Christ. Salvation is entirely the work of God. The Spirit converts us by giving us life. That life that He gives us is not something we can self-generate. Nor can we offer anything, however small, of ourselves to will towards conversion. Nothing means nothing, not a little of something. John 6:63 flat out proved monergism.
Now human reason would assume since salvation is all of God and not all are saved, it must mean God’s saving grace is given only to the elect and not all. But that is not what Christ said in the next passage. He said that His words are spirit and life in them. In other words, there is saving power in His words. Yet, despite that, not all believe. Not all receive God Incarnate who had come for them.
Why? The whore of human reason would be tempted to say it is because man has some measure of freewill to decide for or against God. But Scriptures refute that. Christ said the Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. We did not choose Him but He chose us (John 15:16). God made us alive when we were dead in sins as the grace of God by which we are saved through faith as a gift of God, not of ourselves (Ephesians 2:1-8). None can confess Jesus without the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 12:3). Rebirth is not from human decision (John 1:13).
The other temptation would be to say that God only desires to save some and not all. But John 6:64 ruled that out. His divine word, with the power to save, was resisted. Christ desired to save many in Jerusalem yet was spurned, and He wept for it (Matthew 23:37). The Holy Spirit can be resisted (Acts 7:51). God does desire to save all (1 Timothy 2:1-6, 2 Peter 3:9, John 3:16).
So why are not all saved if God’s saving grace is given to all and if God’s grace alone converts us, not of anything in us? Scriptures do not say. Do note what John 6:64 did say. It said that Jesus had known from the beginning which of them did not believe and who would betray him.
Jesus was God. He had this power of knowledge of what will happen and in regards to who will be saved and won’t. We don’t have this knowledge. It is hidden to God. It is God’s inscrutable will which we dare not try to peer into. We are not essentially told why some come and some do not, when God wants to save all and comes to all yet grace alone saves us, not of any willpower that we can muster in us.
We see then in the passage that God’s revealed will is for them to be saved. Christ’s word is indeed spirit and indeed life given for even those who resist and reject it. He desired to save them, and they refused to believe.
We see then in the passage that God’s revealed will is for them to be saved. Christ’s word is indeed spirit and indeed life given for even those who resist and reject it. He desired to save them, and they refused to believe.
We are left with a paradox that goes against human reason that desires to force these passages to fit together like a puzzle or some Dutch flowery system. But Scriptures do not let us if we read them as these passages are meant to be read.
So why are we given such a paradox in Scriptures?
The truth is that such paradox is for our assurance. We would not know if Christ died for us and given to us objectively by His word through means of grace for us unless if it is objectively for all He died and objectively offered and worked in all. We can be assured of Christ died for us personally in a real true way only if He indeed died for all. Faith alone looks to this objective fact of what’s given for all means that it is true for us personally. Faith alone receives that objective fact and the benefits that this redemptive work of Christ applied to us. We can be certain of that and look outside ourselves for assurance on this objective truth and fact given to us in Word and Sacrament. No need to look inwards nor at one's own faith. And definitely, no need to look to fruits of faith for assurance.
The truth is that such paradox is for our assurance. We would not know if Christ died for us and given to us objectively by His word through means of grace for us unless if it is objectively for all He died and objectively offered and worked in all. We can be assured of Christ died for us personally in a real true way only if He indeed died for all. Faith alone looks to this objective fact of what’s given for all means that it is true for us personally. Faith alone receives that objective fact and the benefits that this redemptive work of Christ applied to us. We can be certain of that and look outside ourselves for assurance on this objective truth and fact given to us in Word and Sacrament. No need to look inwards nor at one's own faith. And definitely, no need to look to fruits of faith for assurance.
The fact God’s grace alone for us, not of ourselves, also give us assurance that as long as in Christ, the same God who converts us, is able to keep us. Again, we do not look to our own selves for assurance nor to keep ourselves. It is in Christ crucified for us that we are saved and in God’s hand. Look outside ourselves to Christ alone given to us in Word and Sacrament, not back at ourselves for assurance. He presented these means of grace to us as indeed His revealed saving will to us. That is where we can be sure that we are elect, when we are in Christ. That is where what is hidden to God becomes revealed to God. It is God Incarnate given to us.
For us and to us we have His forgiveness that He won for us at the cross and which we received (1 Corinthians 15:1-4) in baptism (Acts 2:38, 22:16). And we continue to look to what Christ did to nourish us in the one true faith as His body and blood comes to us in the Eucharist for us to partake of receiving the life that is in Christ’s blood (1 Corinthians 10:16). By grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone. Here we stand.
Excellent article on the "crux theologorum!" I've saved this link along with http://www.stpaulslutheranchurch.net/cruxtheologorum.html as my 2 favorites on this issue. Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteRegin Prenter in his great Luthran Spiritus Creator makes the point that for Luther regarding Zwingli (and by extension Calvin) that the doctrine of ubiquity was not a philosophical counter speculation but very narrowly revelation driven by the two natures in the one person Christ. There can then never be such separation of the two like Zwingli and later Calvin. If there were we then have on one hand the divine in majesty, even the son, and now God nude, and on the other hand the man Christ who is then to be imitated implying a power in the human nature. For Christ's humiliation lay in the fact of him coming down to our level of impotence, and not to show us the example exemplar human. In such Luther saw the poison, on one hand God nude and on the other human nature that can. God so being nude and in majesty this way the thing then in the sacrament would be us having to find a way up to God (Luther's whole point with the enthusiasts was they inverted salvation to us to God and heaven not God descending to us and God as the spirit works inward then outward, latent Platonism and Gnosticism). This meant for Luther that in reality there would be no way to this God in majesty having so divided Christ. This in turn opens the door for reasons speculation and the "successful" speculator who thinks he has found the way up to God (here Christ in the sacrament so divided) is rewarded for it by having done so correctly. Modern Lutherans make a huge mistake contra Luther that Calvinist are monergistic when they are not. Their synergism is not will works but reason speculation). In this case of Zwingli and Calvins supper and sacrament one receives the blessing of the sacrament the forgiveness of sins via the
ReplyDeleteHe work of speculation via the reason. Which now we see is clearly merited since Christ did not come all the way down. It matters not whether you make a real presence as deity in opposition to Christ as both in one person or not, the speculative work is the same. It also matters not whether you put this Calvinistic real presence in heaven as Calvin tended or bring it to earth as some other Calvinist do you still have a nude God to ascend too by speculation in order to merit the blessing. We note well how Calvin said we must elevate our minds and soul to that heavenly place... There is the designated work to begin the ascent. Westhphal had Calvin nailed but few paid attention!
Thus, bob gets saved and receives the blessing because he hears to do this and speculated a way to God in majesty, the son nude and merits the blessing, no less than the forgiveness of sins. Tom, Calvin would call not elect, is damned because he does not find the speculative way up.
The key to seeing calvins deception is in the direction of salvation and understanding it in light of gods descending by uniting with the impotent human nature. To divide calvin's way is to create the nude majesty we cannot approach and then the human nature of Christ becomes the perfect example of how to. The key verses for Luther are "in Him dwells the fullness of the Godhead" and "he who has seen Me has seen the Father" all at once. In essence calvins and zwinglis LS doctrines split up the first verse to then seek the naked majesty of God with salvation when all is said and done is us to Him.
A good question to flesh out Calvins cryptic synergism might be do bob and Tom have to get to God or vice versa, if the later how then does God do this! Once we realize this what must be put in my mouth is the incarnation as there is no other way to forgiveness of sins but this man-God Christ coming to me, my mouth.
This puts the final death knell in Calvins doctrines, it is utterly indefensible once we realize Luther read everything from the perspective of the incarnate God, even limited ubiquity to that revelation alone.
Enjoyed this spot on brother
ReplyDelete