Given theological differences, it is proper to listen to one another carefully so we can understand our differences clearly. We do not want to tell others who they are, but instead listen to them say who they really are.
For example:
Usually in relationships people of course have differing views of each other and who each other is. To work out differences, it is vitally important that others listen to the other "straight from the horse's mouth", as it were.
For example, extroverts view introverts as "anti-social." Whereas, the introverts simply say that *who they are* is focusing on spending their energy on a few people as close friends. Introverts prefer not to talk about the weather, but about deep issues.
So the introverts are misunderstood by the extroverts.
On the other end, extroverts are usually viewed by introverts as arrogant and always wanting to be the center of attention. But the extroverts simply reply that they simply enjoy being around a lot of people, and they enjoy being the life of the party and only wish to have fun.
So the extroverts are misunderstood by the introverts.
SO HOW DOES THIS APPLY TO THEOLOGY, AND MORE IMPORTANTLY TO LUTHERANISM?
These kinds of misunderstandings are sadly all too common in the theological world. Many times different branches and denominations of Christianity apply their own preconceived notions of who they themselves are, and take them and place them on other kinds of Christians.
In fact, many times how people think will come out practically in their interactions with other Christians, especially at the Lord's Table. (For some it will even come out in prayer, etc.)
For example, the Roman Catholics will not commune Lutherans--nor would we want to commune with them. But Rome makes clear that they will commune the Eastern Orthodox, since they view them as having "valid" apostolic succession.
So Rome *views* or *thinks of* the Eastern Orthodox as a "sister church" that is close to her.
But how does the East view itself?
The Eastern Orthodox absolutely forbid their parishioners from communing at a Roman Catholic church (or Eastern Catholic, for that matter). The East only allows their faithful to commune at an Orthodox church. In fact, to commune elsewhere is seen as very serious, even excommunicating oneself.
So the East *views* of *thinks of* herself not as a "sister church" with Rome. Instead, she views Rome as in error and herself as the truth.
***So what does this have to do with Lutheranism?***
I remember when I was evangelical and reformed, and how I thought of the Lutherans during that time. At the time, I *viewed* them and *thought of* them as just another denomination of Christianity. (Rome and the East were not Christian at all, of course, under such thinking.) After all, they taught justification by faith alone, so they had the Gospel. I just thought they were wrong on those naughty sacraments.
I had no problem saying they were welcome to come to my church's version of the Lord's Supper. I didn't see what the big deal was. I mean, we're all Christians, right? I mean I don't think I would have communed at a Lutheran church, because they had naughty sacraments. But they were welcome to commune at mine. It was, after all, simply a memorial or simply a spiritual presence by faith.
I was offended that they would not commune with me.
I was offended that Luther told Zwingli that he was "of another spirit."
I didn't understand what the big deal was.
After all, Lutheranism was "just another denomination" among many. Just another valid choice, right?
***Now that I'm Lutheran, I totally understand.***
You see, we Lutherans do *not*, I repeat, we do NOT view ourselves the way our evangelical and reformed friends view us.
We do NOT think of ourselves as just another "valid choice" of many denominations.
We do NOT think of the Lord's Supper as simply a memorial or only a "spiritual presence."
No indeed.
We view ourselves as an entire *branch* of Christianity.
In fact, we view Lutheranism as where the Gospel is preached most purely.
And we consider other branches and denominations as heterodox.
This is why we cannot in good conscience partake of Holy Communion anywhere else than with those Lutheran churches we are in fellowship with. This is why historically our Confessions and historic Lutheranism has always taken this position.
To take communion at a church that denies the Real Presence would aid and abet that false view of the Supper. In fact, to us, with all due respect to our friends, that false view is blasphemous.
How Christ instituted the Supper means everything to us.
HOW DID CHRIST INSTITUTE THE HOLY SUPPER?
Christ did not institute a supper that was only a memorial where one only remembers in action what He did.
Christ did not institute a supper that points us back to ourselves wondering if we have faith.
Christ did not institute a supper that has us raise ourselves up by faith to feed on Him only spiritually.
No indeed.
Christ furthermore did not institute a supper that atones for the sins of the living not present, nor did He institute a supper that forgives the sins of the dead.
No indeed.
Christ instituted His Most Holy Supper as His True Body and True Blood, given to us to eat, in our mouths, for the forgiveness of all of our sins.
*That* is the Holy Sacrament of the Altar.
SO WHO ARE WE?
So now you can hear it straight from the horse's mouth.
We Lutherans are not just another denomination of Christianity.
We Lutherans do not view all denominations as equally valid.
We Lutherans believe that justification by faith alone must stay central at all times.
We Lutherans reject any sort of turning oneself to their own faith.
We Lutherans believe the Gospel is always outside of us.
We Lutherans see the Word spoken and the Sacraments administered as vital for assurance of salvation and comfort.
We Lutherans see pastoral care as connected to the comfort of the Word and Sacraments.
We Lutherans see *this* Good News as truly Good News, and to be proclaimed to the world.
***So, my fellow Lutherans, please do not let others tell you who you are.***
****For those who really want to know who we are, our Confessions are summarized in the Book of Concord. www.bookofconcord.org ****
This is who we are.
We are simply beggars.
This is most certainly true.
Great summary, podcast partner! That has been my experience as well. And we are beggars all, tis true.
ReplyDeleteJosh very well said. I went a similar route from baptist to reformed baptist to Calvinist infant baptism before Lutheranism. What always concerned me in those is that none of scripture spoke the way our then confessed doctrines spoke. Peter did not say be 'be baptized NOT for the forgiveness of you sins', 'be SPIRITUALLY baptized, the water is superflous', 'take eat/drink... This is NOT My body/blood.', etc.
ReplyDeleteOne of the big things I think Lutherans may be slipping on and it is due to the enchroachment of reformed influence is not JUST the pro me of the Gospel but the actual gift givenness of it. Ie the gospel is mot just good news for me as if information, like hearing you won the lottery. Its actually GIVEN to us, like they hand you the 10 million dollars! This is critical as to what the gospel is and what Luthers tower experience really was rediscovering the very gospel. Justification by faith alone does not mean just news or information communicated to us but the gift of it actually given to us here and now in with and under (ontologically) the word, water, bread,and wine. This sacrament is the gospel says Luther in the small catechism and Christ Himself IS the true sacrament (the Word IS the promise and the promise IS the Word and this means 'IS' ontologically, ie the Word is made flesh). There is no other gospel but the conceived, walking, suffering, risen God. Not even just good news or good information annonuced to and for me, but rather here IS Christ absolving, in water, bread and wine.
That is key because this means there is no distance for us to traverse to get to God, he comes all the way down still into my mouth, on my body, into my dug out ear hole.
This is how works are hidden in calvinism, via the speculative way for example in calvins supper. The theology forces one to look out into heaven specutively for Christ not IN your mouth.
Its just like Jesus asked, same question, who do you say that I am? The same applies to the sacraments, who do you say that I am. Jesus was not a sign pointing to the reality, He IS the sgn and reality.
For the Christian faith a sign IS the presence of God, for philosophy the two are seperate one pointing to the other. This is the difference between the Christian faith and all other religions on earth.
Very well-said!
ReplyDeleteI'm still fuzzy on the Eucharist. Is it for forgiveness or for assurance of forgiveness?
ReplyDeleteRob
Forgive of sins
Delete